/ | search |
← | previous |
→ | next |
pants: STOP GTHIS F*CKING IDIOCY ALREADY! MMM DUH pants: AS FAR AS THE KERNEL IS CONCERNED, A REGRESSIONS IS THE KERNEL NOT GIVING THE SAME END RESULT WITH THE SAME USER SPACE GHLAHGLAHGLUHALG GOOD LORD MEN HAULGUHLAG pants: THE REGRESSION WAS IN THE KERNEL. YOU TRYING TO SHIFT THE REGRESSIONS SOMEWHERE ELSE IS BOGUS SHIT BRRRRR MMM YEAH OOOH BOY pants: AND SERIOUSLY, IT'S THE KIND OF GARBAGE THAT MAKES ME THINK YOUR OPINION AND YOUR CODE CANNOT BE RELIED ON OOH BALLS HLAGHUAHGLAG DUH pants: IF YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO ADMIT THAT YOUR COMMIT 651E28C5537A ("APPARMOR: ADD BASE TO INFASTRUCTURE FOR SOCKET MEDIATION") CAUSED A REGRESSION, THEN HONESTLY, I DON'T WANT TO GET COMMITS FROM YOU FAT FARTS AHOY pants: IT'S THAT SIMPLE. pants: I'M *VERY* UNHAPPY WITH THE SECURITY LAYER AS IS, THE LAST THING I WANT TO SEE IS SOME SECURITY LAYER DEVELOPER THAT THEN GOES ON TO TRY TO RE-DEFINE WAS REGRESSION MEANS HLGAHGULAHGLUAG EATING IT ALL HALGHULAGUG pants: äOOp ÃÂ¥Oùp I,W â©ÃÂSIpàpOMN SÃÂâ´â©ÃÂS â´HâÂÂâ´ IS â ùÃÂäùÃÂSSION OH Iâ² â ÂOâ© qùÃÂâÂÂàÃÂXISâ´INä â©SÃÂù SÃÂâÂÂÃÂàpants: IT'S NOT OK TO SAY "BUT WE'LL FIX THE USER SPACE SETUP" GARK GARK GARK GARK pants: IT'S THAT SIMPLE. pants: REALLY. NOT OK. pants: I THINK I WILL HAVE TO REVERT THAT GARBAGE, FOR THE SIMPLE REASON THAT I REFUSE TO HAVE CODE IN THE KERNEL FROM MAINTAINERS THAT CANNOT EVEN UNDERSTAND THE FIRST RULE OF KERNEL DEVELOPMENT HALGHLAUGHLUHGLUAG I EAT POO HALGHUALG pants: THE FIRST RULE IS: -WE DON'T CAUSE REGRESSIONS SMOOSHING AND SMEARING IT pants: AND THE COROLLARY IS THAT WHEN REGRESSIONS *DO* OCCUR, WE ADMIT TO THEM AND FIX THEM, INSTEAD OF BLAMING USER SPACE FUCK SHIT FUCK FUCK I'M GOIN' DOWN pants: THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE APPARENTLY BEEN DENYING THE REGRESSION NOW FOR THREE WEEKS MEANS THAT I WILL REVERT, AND I WILL SOP PULLING APPARMOR REQUESTS UNTIL THE PEOPLE INVOLVED UNDERSTAND HOW KERNEL DEVELOPMENT IS DONE MMMM DUH WET ONES